Updated: Nov 10, 2019
Jan. 21, 2019| By Diane Mapes / Fred Hutch News Service
Original article published on FredHutch.org here.
Study reveals how blood vessels in the bone marrow protect dormant tumor cells, suggests a way to kill them in their sleep.
Fred Hutch translational researcher Dr. Cyrus Ghajar talks about the spread of breast cancer tumor cells during the third annual Northwest Metastatic Breast Cancer Conference in October 2018. Video excerpt by Connor O'Shaughnessy / Fred Hutch News Service
Researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle may have found a way to essentially smother cancer cells in their sleep, preventing them from ever waking up and forming deadly metastatic tumors.
The work, led by translational researcher Dr. Cyrus Ghajar, has also turned on its ear the longstanding belief that chemotherapy can’t kill dormant disseminated tumor cells — cancer cells that escape early on and hide out in other regions of the body — because those cells are in a “sleeper state.” They’ve stopped growing so chemo, which blindly targets all fast-growing cells, healthy and otherwise, doesn’t work.
That’s not quite the case.
“It’s always been assumed that dormant cells cannot be killed by any kind of chemotherapy because they’re not dividing,” said Ghajar, who runs the Laboratory for the Study of Metastatic Microenvironments at Fred Hutch. “But what we’re showing is that’s not true. They’re relying on survival signaling in their microenvironment, in this case specifically from blood vessels within the bone marrow. And if you can take away that signaling, you can sensitize them to chemotherapy.”
Ghajar’s paper, published today in Nature Cell Biology, is the culmination of more than four years’ work and proposes both a paradigm shift in how we view dormant disseminated tumor cells — and a new therapy to potentially slay this sleeping giant. Although it’s still early days, Ghajar and his team slashed the metastatic relapse rate in his mice by more than two-thirds.
Rebecca Seago-Coyle, a 43-year-old IT project manager and breast cancer survivor who worked with the team as a research advocate, said she loved Ghajar’s innovative approach — and his inclusiveness.
“One thing I love about Cyrus is that he makes room for patients,” she said. “We always have a seat at the table. I’m not metastatic, but I still have that fear that the cancer could come back. Thirty percent of early stagers go on to become metastatic. If we could lower that number, that would be huge.”
The nonlinear path to metastasis
Cancer doesn’t just spread because a primary tumor has reached a certain size or stage. Disseminated tumor cells, or DTCs, can break off before a tumor has even formed and travel to distant sites in the body where they lie dormant until something “wakes them up” and they start the deadly process of metastasis, or cancer spread/colonization.
One common hideout for these sleepy creeps is the bone marrow. Dormant tumor cells have been found in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients at the very earliest stage of the disease — DCIS or stage 0 — and Ghajar said they’re mostly likely present in other patients with early-stage disease, as well.
Past research has shown an association between DTCs in the bone marrow of cancer patients and metastatic recurrence — and not necessarily just bone metastasis.
“Patients with breast cancer cells in the marrow recur more often than patients who don’t have cells in the bone marrow,” said Ghajar, who collaborated with a cadre of Fred Hutch researchers as well as scientists from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and the University of California, San Diego. “And tumor cells in the bone marrow predict metastasis in a variety of different sites. They even predict metastasis in cancers that never get bone mets.”
Why disseminated tumor cells snuggle up to the bone marrow microenvironment where they go dormant is still a bit of a mystery, although we do know that dormant blood stem cells hang out in the same place. What wakes the sleeping cancer cells up and starts them growing again also remains a huge question.
But Ghajar said there’s scientific evidence that “if you can successfully remove disseminated tumor cells, you can prevent those patients from having mets.”
And that has become the focus of his work.
Breast cancer’s ‘long tail’
For this research, Ghajar and his team focused on the most common type of breast cancer, estrogen-receptor positive (or ER+), which comes back as metastatic disease five or more years after treatment in up to 17 percent of early-stage patients. In comparison, the metastatic recurrence rate for all breast cancer patients is thought to be between 20 and 30 percent.
“There’s this long tail in ER+ breast cancer where patients will go for years and years without any kind of problem and then five, seven, 10, 15, 20 years later, they have a recurrence,” Ghajar said.
Unlike some early-stage cancers, metastatic disease is incurable. Patients with stage 4 disease are in treatment for the rest of their lives. And while some patients live with their cancer for years — or even decades — when their treatment stops working or they run out of options, they die.
Ghajar’s finding, if it holds true, could reduce the number of early stagers who go on to become metastatic, effectively snipping off breast cancer’s long tail.
“We’re not trying to treat a primary tumor or trying to treat mets,” he said. “We’re trying to treat DTCs, for which there are no current therapies.”
Teri Pollastro, 58, another research advocate who worked with Ghajar, went from DCIS, or stage 0, to stage 4 years after her initial treatment. She believes her advanced cancer was a direct result of awakened DTCs.
“That’s exactly what happened to me,” she said. “They stopped treatment and the stuff that was quiet and sleeping came to life.”
Uncoupling dormancy and chemo resistance
Ghajar said work he did as a postdoc in the lab of Dr. Mina Bissell at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, as well as research done at the Hutch by Dr. Pete Nelson, led him to question the conventional wisdom of DTCs surviving chemo due to their paused cell cycle.
“We’ve seen evidence that quiescent cells respond to chemo,” Ghajar said. “They seem to sense when you dump chemicals on them. And there’s been other evidence that architecture — the microenvironment — may be more important than the cell-cycle state in terms of the response to chemotherapy.” Tumor microenvironments are the noncancerous cells and molecules surrounding tumor cells; they're often co-opted by the cancer to help it grow.
To pursue this scientific question, Ghajar and his team looked at how DTCs behaved in two preclinical models: mice with breast cancer and organotypic cultures, i.e., human blood vessels and bone marrow tissues growing in a dish.
The researchers first dosed mice with chemotherapy, then looked for DTCs in their bone marrow. The only tumor cells that survived were those that were nestled close to the microvasculature, the tiny blood vessels of the bone marrow. They then seeded the organotypic cultures with human breast cancer cells. The tumor cells surrounded by blood vessels grew dormant; those without blood vessels continued to rapidly divide. The team then treated the tiny tumor environments with chemotherapy to determine whether DTC survival was coincidental, or something else.
“When we added increasing doses of chemotherapy, we noticed that without blood vessels, the breast tumor cells died,” he said. “And with the blood vessels, the breast tumor cells didn’t die. So maybe the blood vessels were protective.”
To find out, Ghajar and his colleagues used a growth factor to wake up the dormant cells, then treated them with chemotherapy. Conventional wisdom held that the awakened DTCs would be killed because they were now active and rapidly dividing. But that’s not what happened.
“It didn’t matter at all that we had woken them up,” he said. “The chemotherapy had no effect because the blood vessels were there.”
Silence the signal, kill the cancer
The researchers then went about trying to determine what it was about the blood vessels that offered protection to both active and quiescent cancer cells. In collaboration with Peter Nelson’s laboratory at the Hutch, they used RNA sequencing to a look at the genes that were being activated or expressed in the organotypic cultures both with and without the blood vessels. They then used protein analysis or proteomics to discover what, exactly, was being secreted and deposited on the surface of the various cells that might result in this protection.
Eventually, they found the answer.
“The main thing that was being enriched when blood vessels were present — as opposed to when they weren’t present — were molecules that bind integrins,” Ghajar said.
Integrins are proteins that, among other things, help with cell signaling; they integrate signals from the outside of the cell with the inside of the cell. Humans produce different types of integrins, and there are also several existing molecular inhibitors, or “off-switches,” for them. The research team screened these integrin inhibitors to see if any would interrupt the blood vessels' protective signaling and found two that did just that. They then combined integrin inhibition with chemotherapy and tried it out on the preclinical model of human bone marrow — to great effect.
“When we interrupted signaling from those two integrins, we started sensitizing cells to chemotherapy,” Ghajar said. “Chemo on its own would kill one third of all the single cells in our culture. But when we combined integrin inhibition and chemotherapy, we killed over 90 percent of the single cells in our cultures.”
What’s more, the team was able to kill the DTCs without first waking them up, showing that cell division was not necessary to get chemo’s toxic attention.
Once the researchers moved onto mouse models with this new combo therapy, they were able to reduce the reservoir of DTCs in their bone marrow by 94 percent. Further, by following the mice for a number of months, they determined their odds of metastatic recurrence were greatly reduced.
“With only chemo, over 70 percent of the mice relapsed with mets,” Ghajar said. “But when we used the combo only about 22 percent of them relapsed with bone mets. We were able to save a lot of mice from relapsing with breast cancer metastases using this approach.”
Next steps for the science
The big question, as always, is “Will it work in humans?”
“Oftentimes, you have something that looks beautiful in a mouse, but when you try it in a human, it never works the same,” Ghajar said. “But we really tried hard to mitigate that by the models we used.”
Ghajar said his next step will be to make human versions of the molecule he used for integrin inhibition and then test them to make sure they’re safe in people. Once that’s established, the research can move toward a clinical trial that tests the new combo therapy on cancer patients.
Although cautious about getting ahead of the science (a clinical trial could be three to five years away), Ghajar does believe his research demonstrates that dormant cells can be killed by chemo without waking them up, which is significant in and of itself.
“No matter what happens with regard to the specific molecules we’ve discovered, that concept is going to endure,” he said.
Could this potentially help patients currently living with metastatic breast cancer? Ghajar said it’s too early to draw any conclusions about that.
“We’re trying to find a way that we can augment therapy up front to kill the roots of metastasis before they arise,” he said. “Would this possibly be a way to eliminate the cells that are going to seed the second met or the third met or the fourth? There’s potential, but it’s not something we trialed experimentally.”
Pollastro, the patient advocate living with metastatic disease, said she’s optimistic, despite the nascent stage of Ghajar’s work.
“Everything starts in a mouse model, doesn’t it?” she said. “I’m very hopeful. And that’s a great next question for him to investigate. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if that worked?”
Funding for this research came from Fred Hutch, the Cuyamaca Foundation, a Department of Defense Era of Hope Award, Breast Cancer Research Fund, National Breast Cancer Coalition’s Artemis Project for Metastasis Prevention, Susan G. Komen, the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and the Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium.
Diane Mapes is a staff writer at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. She has written extensively about health issues for NBC News, TODAY, CNN, MSN, Seattle Magazine and other publications. A breast cancer survivor, she blogs at doublewhammied.com and tweets @double_whammied. Email her at email@example.com.
Are you interested in reprinting or republishing this story? Be our guest! We want to help connect people with the information they need. We just ask that you link back to the original article, preserve the author’s byline and refrain from making edits that alter the original context. Questions? Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org